
Training matters but without systemic change, even the best SEND training will struggle to deliver real inclusion.
The government’s announcement of a £200 million SEND training programme for education staff is, without question, positive news. For many families, particularly those who have spent years fighting to be heard, this signals that their voices have finally cut through. A commitment to improving SEND support across nurseries, schools and colleges is welcome, and it deserves recognition.
What I See From Both Sides of the System
I say this as an ex secondary school teacher of 20 years, and now as Director of Crossroads Educational Consultants. My work today is with families who are often forced into home education because appropriate support simply isn’t available in school. Many of the children we support have SEND, and they are not unable to learn. They are learners who could thrive in mainstream education if the right support, time and flexibility were genuinely in place.
“Children with SEND are not unable to learn — they are learners who could thrive if the system allowed them to.”
Why Standardising SEND Training Matters
Standardising SEND training feels like the right move. For too long, the quality and depth of training has varied widely between settings, leaving staff with very different levels of confidence and understanding. Consistency matters, and done well, this could be a powerful lever for change.
The Reality Schools Are Working In
But training does not exist in a vacuum.
Schools are under immense pressure. Recruitment remains below target, retention is fragile, and workload continues to dominate conversations with teachers at every stage of their career. In this context, introducing new training expectations must be handled carefully. Without additional time, capacity and trust, even the most thoughtfully designed training risks becoming another demand placed on an already overstretched workforce.
When the System Undermines Inclusion
It’s also important to acknowledge that training has never been the only issue. Many teachers already know what inclusive practice looks like. The challenge lies in implementing it within a system that remains heavily exam-focused and outcomes-driven. When success is narrowly defined by results, schools are forced into difficult choices. Those pupils most likely to meet benchmarks are prioritised, while others, often pupils with SEND, receive less than they need, despite the best intentions of staff.
This is not a failure of understanding or commitment. It is a structural problem.
“This is not a failure of teachers — it is a failure of the system they are working in.”
What Teachers Actually Need to Make Inclusion Work
If we are serious about inclusion, teachers need more than training. They need smaller class sizes, reduced pressure around target grades, and psychologically safe environments where they can try new strategies without fear of repercussions. They need time and resources to reflect, adapt and embed inclusive practice properly.
Without these conditions, even high-quality training risks becoming symbolic rather than transformative.
Children at the Crossroads
At Crossroads, we work with children who sit at the crossroads of the system. Learners who have not failed education, but who have been failed by a system moving too fast to adapt. These are children who could succeed, if the environment allowed them to do so.
A Moment We Shouldn’t Waste
This SEND training programme is a step in the right direction. To truly deliver lasting change, it needs to sit alongside a broader shift in how success is defined and how schools are supported to meet diverse needs. Inclusion is not just about understanding, it’s about permission, prioritisation and pace.
Let’s use this moment not just to train differently, but to change the conditions that determine whether inclusion is even possible.
About the author
Kate Gibson is an ex secondary school science teacher with 20 years’ experience in education and is now Director of Crossroads Educational Consultants. She works with families whose children have SEND and who are often forced into home education due to a lack of appropriate school support. She is committed to ensuring home-educated children receive equitable access to education.
Share


